Legal Opinion
Syufy Enterprises v. National General Theatres, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1978No. 76-2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellant appeals from a directed verdict granted on its antitrust claim against appel-lees. The district court concluded that the evidence of violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, was insufficient. We affirm.
FACTS
This action was filed in federal district court in 1971 alleging violations of §§ 1 and 21 of the Sherman Act. In essence, the complaint charged certain Las Vegas thea-tre owners of conspiring with non-named film distributors to confine the exhibition of first run films to appellees’ theatres. In addition, appellees were charged with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Calnetics Corporation and Meier-Line, Inc. v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., Calnetics Corporation v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., (Five Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Dahl, Inc. v. Roy Cooper Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zoslaw v. MCA Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- General Cinema Corp. v. Buena Vista Distribution Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1982
- Charles Zoslaw v. Mca Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Wright v. Southern Mono Hospital DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.