Legal Opinion

State v. Seyferth

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 15, 1986No. 86-0252-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Following denial of a motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to the execution of a search warrant, Todd Michael Seyferth pled guilty to a charge of unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver pursuant to secs. 161.41 (lm) and 161.14, Stats. A judgment of conviction was entered accordingly. Seyferth appeals from the judgment, specifically raising upon this appeal the question of whether the nighttime execution of the search warrant was valid. We conclude the execution of the search warrant was in compliance with statutory and constitutional standards. Therefore,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. FryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. WoodsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gooding v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  2. State v. KruseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. State v. DurbinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. State v. BetterleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. State v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API