Legal Opinion

Almond v. Rhyne

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1993No. 9120SC1166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Judge.

Defendant makes two arguments on appeal. He contends the trial court erred (1) in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) in denying his motion for partial summary judgment. Summary judgment should be rendered only when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions and affidavits disclose no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Town of West Jefferson v. Edwards, 74 N.C.App. 377, 329 S.E.2d 407 (1985). If an issue of material fact exists, then the trial court should not grant summary…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Hayes v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hobco Auto Sales, Inc. v. DewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. Smith v. MauldinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Weeks v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API