Legal Opinion

(PC) Hernandez v. Marcelo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 15, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01219Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARINO ANTONIO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01219-NONE-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 13 v. TO DISMISS 14 J. MARCELO, et al., (Doc. 20) 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to partially dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 18 20.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion on August 11, 2020. (Doc. 27.) 19 Defendants have not filed a reply, and the time to do so has passed. See Local Rule 230(l). For the 20 reasons…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API