Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kirkland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1967No. 7862PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal in a will contest action. A summary judgment entered in the District Court is reformed to order dismissal of the proceeding and as reformed the judgment is affirmed.

On December 8, 1964, Mary Sue Thompson and Joe Kirkland filed a pleading in the County Court of Wood County to set aside a certain probate order of that court on the ground that an instrument previously admitted to probate, by order of such County Court dated September 14, 1964, as J. M. Kirkland’s will was not Kirkland’s will but was the product of undue influence upon J. M. Kirkland, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bell v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Sorrell v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Scheetz v. BaderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Cannon v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Crane v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gulf Const. Co., Inc. v. Self, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  2. Sone v. BraunigCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Howeth Investments, Inc. v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Perl v. Patrizi, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. State Bar of Texas v. Grossenbacher, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API