Legal Opinion

Perl v. Patrizi

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided May 25, 2000No. 06-99-00076-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Joe G. Perl contends that Patrizi’s Restaurants, Inc. breached a contract with him that entitled him to realtor’s fees or a commission on the lease or sale of property. At the end of Perl’s evidence, the trial court rendered a directed verdict in favor of Patrizi’s Restaurants and dismissed Pa-trizi’s counterclaims. Both parties appeal.1

Perl first contends that the court erred by granting the directed verdict because the commission agreement, despite the absence of a termination date, was lawful and enforceable. Based on a favorable outcome of that determination,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Centex Corp. v. DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lewis v. Jacksonville Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Trammell Crow Co. No. 60 v. HarkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Boyert v. TauberTexas Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cate v. Woods, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  2. Northborough Corporate Ltd. Partnership v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. Greenville Surgical Associates, P.A. v. Robert Carlson, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Northborough Corporate Limited Partnership, L.L.P. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Northborough Corporate Ltd. Partnership v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API