Perl v. Patrizi
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
Joe G. Perl contends that Patrizi’s Restaurants, Inc. breached a contract with him that entitled him to realtor’s fees or a commission on the lease or sale of property. At the end of Perl’s evidence, the trial court rendered a directed verdict in favor of Patrizi’s Restaurants and dismissed Pa-trizi’s counterclaims. Both parties appeal.1
Perl first contends that the court erred by granting the directed verdict because the commission agreement, despite the absence of a termination date, was lawful and enforceable. Based on a favorable outcome of that determination,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hohenberg Bros. Co. v. George E. Gibbons & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Centex Corp. v. DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Lewis v. Jacksonville Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Trammell Crow Co. No. 60 v. HarkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Boyert v. TauberTexas Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cate v. Woods, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
- Northborough Corporate Ltd. Partnership v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Greenville Surgical Associates, P.A. v. Robert Carlson, M.D., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Northborough Corporate Limited Partnership, L.L.P. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Northborough Corporate Ltd. Partnership v. Cushman & Wakefield of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.