United States ex rel. Saldivar v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge
This qui tarn action arises out of allegations that Defendant Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America (“Fresenius” or “FMCNA”) violated the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, on a'regular basis when it submitted requests for reimbursement for lucrative dialysis drugs that it received for free. Relator Chester Sal-divar alleges that Fresenius billed Medicare for administration of overfill — a varying amount of extra medicine contained in individual vials the purpose of which is to facilitate…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Ex Rel. Saldivar v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016