Legal Opinion
Luther K. Barnett, Jr. v. Steve Hargett
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 16, 1999No. 98-6244PublishedCited by 300 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Respondent appeals from the district court’s grant of a conditional writ of habe-as corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court determined that Petitioner had raised a procedural and substantive competency claim in his federal petition, that appellate counsel was ineffective for not pursuing such claims when Petitioner’s direct appeal had been remanded to the state district court, and that the record before the state district court was insufficient to support its finding that a competency hearing had occurred and a finding of competency had been entered.…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- Billy Keith McGregor v. Gary Gibson, Warden, Oklahoma State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Smallwood v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Van Woudenberg Ex Rel. Foor v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Firstenberg v. City of Santa FeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.