Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Harrison Township

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 6, 2011No. Case No. 2:10-cv-13144PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Harrison Township (the “Township”) and Anthony Forlini’s (“Forlini”) motion for summary judgment and to dismiss Raymond Elder (“Mr. Elder”) and Lana Elder’s (“Dr. Elder”) (collectively “Plaintiffs” or the “Elders”) claims for various constitutional violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. No. 12.) Additional defendants Erin Hardcastle-Mehlhose (“Hard-castle”) and Vijay Parakh (“Parakh”) (collectively with the Township and Forlini “Defendants”) filed a concurrence to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. River Park, Inc. v. City of Highland ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elder v. HARRISON TOWNSHIPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API