Legal Opinion
Bothum v. Saul
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 12, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00196Unknown
1Opinion
WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA MARK SUMNER BOTHUM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner, ) Social Security Administration, ) ) No. 3:20-cv-0196-HRH Defendants. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R This is an action for judicial review of the denial of disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401–434, 1381-1383f. Plaintiff Mark Sumner Bothum has timely filed his opening brief,1 to which defendant Andrew M. Saul has timely responded.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.