Legal Opinion

Hebert v. Hatch

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1954No. 3899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

These two suits were consolidated for the purpose of trial in the district court.. The suit of Roy Hebert against the defendant Howard E. Hatch is for damages for personal injuries, mental pain and suffering growing out of a. collision between a motorcycle being operated by him as a traffic patrolman of the city of Baton Rouge and a Jeep automobile being driven by the defendant Howard E. Hatch. The suit of the city of Baton Rouge, against the same defendant is for the value or damage to the motorcycle, being operated by the plaintiff Roy Hebert and destroyed in the collision.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michelli v. Rheem Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Lane v. BourgeoisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Harris v. BigbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hebert v. HatchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. State ex rel. Lard v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API