Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Vaughan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California

Decided March 16, 1896No. 11,877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Suit in equity for infringement in importing, using, and selling horse hayforks in the state of California, and to restrain the further sale of the same.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity, brought by Byron Jackson against F. W. Vaughan, for alleged infringement of letters patent Nos. 197,137 and 21.0,548, for improvements in horse hayforks, in importing, using, and selling said hayforks in the state of California. The facts show that Jackson is the owner of the patents referred to on horse hayforks; that Jackson licensed F. E. Myers & Bros., of Ashland, in the state of Ohio, to exclusively manufacture and sell horse hayforks, under said patents, within the territory of the United States lying east of the Rocky Mountains, said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bloomer v. McQuewanSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Mitchell v. HawleySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Security Materials Co. v. Mixermobile Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API