Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Empire Securities Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1920No. Civ. No. 3228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWeller, J.

This action of interpleader was instituted by the county treasurer of Los Angeles County to compel the defendants to litigate among themselves their claims to certain bonds held by him in his official capacity and representing the contract price of road work done by George L. Carroll, as contractor, under the provisions of the Road District Improvement Act of 1907. (Stats. 1907, p. 806.)

The controversy here arises between the Empire Securities Company (assignee of Carroll, the contractor) and various parties who furnished materials and labor in the performance of the contracts with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Slayden v. O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McMorry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Castro v. MalcolmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Santa Cruz Portland Cement Co. v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API