Legal Opinion · Dissent

CLARK INVESTMENTS, INC. v. Airstream, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 2010No. 3-09-0260Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOLDRIDGE,

dissenting:

I would remand this matter to the circuit court with instruction that the cause be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, conferred by stipulation, or consented to by the parties. City of Marseilles v. Radke, 287 Ill. App. 3d 757, 761 (1997). Subject matter jurisdiction can be raised any time, even on appeal, and may be raised by a court of review sua sponte. Jones v. Industrial Comm’n, 335 Ill. App. 3d 340, 343 (2002).

Here, plaintiff, Clark Investments, Inc., filed a complaint in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Belleville Toyota, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fields Jeep-Eagle, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Marseilles v. RadkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Jones v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API