Legal Opinion

Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1994No. 23487PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court approving a proposed settlement in a shareholders’ derivative action. Respondents have filed motions to dismiss this appeal. Appellants oppose the motions. We hold that the order appealed from is not substantively appealable. We further hold that appellants — a group of minority corporate shareholders who were not parties to the action below — have no standing to pursue this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motions to dismiss.

FACTS

In January 1991, Jeanette Ginsburg, a minority shareholder of respondent Reno Properties Corporation…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by100 opinions

  1. Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Lee v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Allstate Insurance v. ThorpeNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rennels v. RennelsNevada Supreme Court · 2011

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API