Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the district court approving a proposed settlement in a shareholders’ derivative action. Respondents have filed motions to dismiss this appeal. Appellants oppose the motions. We hold that the order appealed from is not substantively appealable. We further hold that appellants — a group of minority corporate shareholders who were not parties to the action below — have no standing to pursue this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motions to dismiss.
FACTS
In January 1991, Jeanette Ginsburg, a minority shareholder of respondent Reno Properties Corporation…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
- Marino v. OrtizSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by100 opinions
- Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Lee v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Calloway v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance v. ThorpeNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- Rennels v. RennelsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.