Legal Opinion

Wingate v. Gin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 26, 1985No. 2 CA-SA 0316PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Petitioner challenges the respondent judge’s refusal to grant his motion for summary judgment. Since petitioner has no plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal, and because our granting relief will terminate this litigation, we assume jurisdiction. Lim v. Superior Court, 126 Ariz. 481, 616 P.2d 941 (App.1980).

Petitioner is the plaintiff in a pending superior court action, and the real parties in interest, Fast Foto, Inc., and the Sandahls, are the defendants. On August 6, 1981, Fast Foto executed a standard shopping center lease agreement for approximately 1,750 square…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Higgins v. KittlesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  2. Lim v. Superior Court in and for Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. United States National Bank v. Homeland, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Dushoff v. Phoenix CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Prevo v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FillmoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Tempe Corporate Office Building v. Arizona Funding Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. MRI Northwest Rentals Investments I, Inc. v. Schnucks-Twenty-Five, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Next Gen Capital, LLC v. Consumer Lending Associates LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API