Legal Opinion

McQuade v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 10, 2006No. A-8754, A-8773PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Bruce Scott McQuade and Forrest U. Johnston appeal their convictions for first-degree robbery. McQuade and Johnston contend that they were subjected to an illegal traffic stop, and that all evidence stemming from that traffic stop should be suppressed. For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the traffic stop was justified because the police had reasonable suspicion that McQuade’s and Johnston’s vehicle was fleeing from the scene of a just-committed robbery. We therefore affirm McQuade’s and Johnston’s convictions.

Underlying facts

At 2:43 a.m. on September 6,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Waring v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  5. Gutierres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lum v. KolesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Andrew Craig Simpson v. State of Alaska, Andrew Craig Simpson v. State of Alaska, Andrew Craig Simpson v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021
  4. Lum v. KolesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. MillerAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API