Lum v. Koles
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARNEY, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Lum family sued two police officers and the North Slope Borough for trespass and invasion of privacy after an allegedly unlawful entry into the Lums' home. The superior court dismissed both claims on summary judgment, reasoning that the officers were protected by qualified immunity under state law because the Lums had not produced sufficient evidence that the officers acted in bad faith. We reverse the superior court's decision because there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether they acted in bad faith.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Daniel Lum's…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richard R. Watkinson v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Billy Dean Smith and Jacob Lee Anagick v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- State of Alaska v. John William Mckelvey IIIAlaska Supreme Court · 2024