Legal Opinion

Dockerty v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1923No. 10,708PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

Plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of feloniously assaulting and taking indecent liberties with his daughter Marjorie, a child of the age of fifteen years, and brings error.

The principal error assigned and argued is that evidence was admitted, over the objection of defendant, of acts of sexual intercourse between defendant and an older daughter, some months prior to the date of the offense charged.

The admission of this evidence is defended on the ground that it comes within the exception to the general .rule excluding evidence of other offenses, which allows evidence of such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LonsdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. La MontSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. LetoileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. Janzen v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stull v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. People v. GarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Pigford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Godfrey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API