Legal Opinion
Scott v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 14, 2000No. 90 Civ. 0494(RJW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendants have moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c), for summary judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
On January 22, 1990, Scott filed the present action pro se under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, charging eleven defendants with violating his constitutional rights while he was an inmate at the Green Haven Correctional Facility. 1 The facts in this case are set forth in detail in Scott v. Albury, 156 F.3d 283 (2d Cir.1998) and Scott v. Coughlin, 944 F.Supp. 266 (S.D.N.Y.1996).…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Colon v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Scott v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Smith v. DinoiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020