Templeman v. Templeman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gilbert, J".
1. "The power of appointing receivers and ordering injunctions should be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” Civil Code (1910), § 5477.
2. "The appointment of a receiver is a harsh' remedy to which resort should not be had, except when the interests of creditors are exposed to manifest peril.” Dixon v. Tucker, 167 Ga. 783 (1 a) (146 S. E. 736).
3. "The high prerogative act of taking property out of the hands of one, and putting it in pound, under the order of a judge, ought not to be taken, except to prevent manifest…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crawford v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Dixon v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Dozier v. LoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Gartrell v. McCraveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cleveland v. TullySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Cozzolino v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Frankel v. FrankelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Wright v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935