Kroner v. Oneida Seven Generations Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 70. {concurring). This is the first case to come before us based on a nonconsensual transfer of a nontribal member's lawsuit to tribal court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 801.54. *659We are asked to evaluate whether the transfer to tribal court was lawful. I do not join the lead opinion of Justice N. Patrick Crooks, but rather conclude that the transfer to Oneida Tribal Court was not lawful because: (1) § 801.54 was retrospectively applied in violation of John N. Kroner's vested substantive, constitutional rights, including, but not limited to, his right of access to Wisconsin courts granted by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Talton v. MayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. LaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.