Legal Opinion

Express Car Wash Corp. v. Irinaga Bros., Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 4, 1997No. Civil 96-696-JOPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge:

This action arises under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s (RCRA’s) citizen suit provision, 42 U.S.C. § 6972, and the Oregon Superfund statutes. Plaintiff Express Car Wash filed a citizen suit against defendants Chevron U.S.A. and Irinaga Brothers, alleging that hazardous waste in the form of petroleum products is contaminating its real property. Irinaga Brothers then filed a third-party action against John Mitchell, Inc.

This case is now before me on defendant Chevron U.S.A.’s and defendant Irinaga Brothers’ motions (# 41, # 46) for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United Steelworkers of America v. Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Community Ass'n for Restoration of the Environment, Inc. v. Cow Palace, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2015
  2. ABB Industrial Systems, Inc. v. Prime Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  3. City of Waukesha v. Viacom International Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  4. City of Colton v. AMERICAN PROMOTIONAL EVENTS, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Avondale Federal Savings Bank v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API