Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 2015No. 13CR1517; A156746PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this criminal case, defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of $400 in court-appointed attorney fees. Defendant did not object to the fees and asks that we exercise our discretion to review the assigned error as a “plain error.” See ORAP 5.45(1) (authorizing appellate courts to review an unpreserved error as an “error of law apparent on the record”). The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred by imposing the fees. For the reasons explained below, we agree with the parties that the trial court erred by imposing the fees, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. Ramirez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Bacote v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HousegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. ShepherdWashington County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API