Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Gore

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 22, 1935No. 13,339PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

An action for damages, growing out of an automobile accident. The complaint of defendant in error Gore, plaintiff below, was in two counts, one for the death of his wife, the other for injuries to himself and damage to his car. The defendants were Lundin, Morgan, and Hertz Drivurself System, Inc. Lundin and Morgan were driving separate cars, Morgan, one rented from the Hertz System. Plaintiff was driving a third car. On a showing of compliance with section 103 (a), Uniform Motor Vehicle Act, Session Laws 1931, chapter 122, the Hertz System was dismissed as a defendant. A jury returned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall ex rel. Hall v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HalleckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Harris v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. Hindrey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pure Gas & Chemical Company v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Aspen Skiing Co. v. PeerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Boulder Valley School District R-2 v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. School District No. 12 v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. Weeks v. ChurchillColorado Court of Appeals · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API