Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1984No. 55,324PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wahl, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Fred Burdick, d/b/a B & G Construction and Burdick Construction, from the dismissal of his negligence and breach of contract action against the defendant, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company.

Burdick is a self-employed carpenter in El Dorado. From 1974 until December, 1980, he was engaged in business under the name of B & G Construction and had a business listing under that name with a telephone number of 316-321-9439 in the telephone book. In the latter part of 1980, Burdick renewed an agreement with Southwestern Bell Telephone Company to maintain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Wilkinson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Invenchek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Blackburn v. ColvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Holman v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Danisco Ingredients USA, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Auchan USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Satellite System, Inc. v. Birch Telecom of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. In Re Application of Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
  5. Professional Answering Service, Inc. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API