Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Chicago Housing Authority
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 23, 2003No. 03 C 0491PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Defendants the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) and Terry Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of CHA, move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. (R. 17-1.)
RELEVANT FACTS
Plaintiffs sued on behalf of a class of current and former residents of CHA who were, or will be, relocated from public housing during CHA’s process of demolishing its high-rise apartment complexes in lieu of new, mixed-income…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of ChesapeakeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- In re Adoption of the 2003 Low Income Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation PlanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Wallace v. Chicago Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Mhany Management Inc. v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Linnemann v. Post (Mission Bay Ski & Bike, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.