Legal Opinion
Stanko v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-0724PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Rudy Stanko was at the time he filed this suit a federal prisoner. Now released, this prolific litigant maintains yet another action against the Federal Bureau of Prisons, this one pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. He claims that BOP has wrongfully withheld documents that he is entitled to under FOIA. On July 6, 2011, this Court issued a lengthy Memorandum Opinion granting in part and denying in part BOP’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Now that Defendant believes it has cured the deficiencies…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coffey v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Pinson v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Howard v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Adams v. AlexanderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Surgey v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021