Legal Opinion

United States v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided November 1, 1971No. Civ. No. 2942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, Chief Judge.

A motion to amend a complaint to add a party defendant raises a heretofore undiscussed problem of federal jurisdiction under the Miller Act.1

Santa Fe Engineers, Inc., a prime contractor subject to the terms of the Miller Act, employed a subcontractor, Mae-con, Inc., to do a portion of the work. Maecon, Inc. in turn subcontracted a portion of the work to Falls Construction Company, the use plaintiff. Use plaintiff, claiming to be unpaid, brought this action against Santa Fe Engineers, Inc., the prime contractor, and Travelers Indemnity Co., the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Par-Lock Appliers of New Jersey, Inc. v. J. A. J. Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. United States ex rel. Par-Lock Appliers of New Jersey, Inc. v. J. A. J. Const. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Polied Environmental Services, Inc. v. Incor Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API