Palmer v. Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
Jermaine Palmer (Palmer), pro se, petitions the Court for its review of the November 20, 2006 order entered by the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) denying Palmer’s request under the statute commonly known as the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) 1 for a copy of a criminal laboratory user fee statement. The questions involved are whether the PSP’s denial of Palmer’s request was unjust and improper when he specifically identified the type of document sought and whether the PSP may evade disclosure by showing lack of actual possession.
Palmer is currently serving prison terms…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tribune-Review Publishing Co. v. Westmoreland County Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rowland v. Commonwealth, Public School Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Carbondale Township v. MurrayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bargeron v. Department of Labor & Industry, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Nanayakkara v. CasellaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lukes v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Palmer, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Delaware County v. Schaefer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County2011