Legal Opinion

Parchman v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Associate Justice.

The indictment charges theft of an “ ox,” without using the statutory word “ cattle.”

Following previous decisions of this court, we hold that under the Code of Criminal Procedure this is a sufficient indictment for theft of “cattle.” (The State v. Otto Lange, 22 Tex., 591; The State v. Eisenheimer, Austin Term, 1875.)

It may he added that sufficiency of such an indictment, outside of the code, is maintained by some very respectable authorities. (Bishop on Stat. Crimes, sec. 440, ref. to The State v. Pearce, Peck, 66; The State v. Hambleton, 22 Mo., 452; The State v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HambletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. State v. LangeTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1848

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API