Legal Opinion

State v. Abbott

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 15, 1848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Indictment for wounding and maiming a certain “ red, three year old steer.” After a verdict of guilty, the respondent moved in arrest of judgment, for .the insufficiency-of the indictment; which motion was overruled by the court, April Term, 1845, — Redfield, J., presiding. Exceptions by respondent.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redfield, J.

The only question, raised in the present case, is in regard to the sufficiency of the indictment. It is for a violation of the statute against maiming, or wounding, cattle. The objection *538is, that the defendant is charged with wounding a steer, without alleging, that a steer is “ cattle, or other beast,” — which are the words of the statute. It is very possible, that some of the old cases may have adopted a degree of strictness, equal to this, even. But no modern case of this character existSj it is believed; but the contrary has often been…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Town of Wolcott v. SticklesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Wilson v. Union Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  4. Parchman v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Robertson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API