Legal Opinion

Gauthier v. Peiter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 69, Calendar No. 37,547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Prior to March 30, 1933, plaintiff, Clarence Gauthier, had been in the employ of defendant William L. Peiter. A dispute arose between the parties as to the amount due from Peiter to Gauthier. By agreement they reached a settlement incident to which Gauthier executed and gave to Peiter a receipt “in full settlement and satisfaction of any and all salary, bonus, and commissions due or to become due the undersigned.” The consideration received by Gauthier incident to this settlement is expressed in exhibit A and reads as follows :

“Grand Rapids, Michigan
“March 30, 1933.
“For a valuable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schwartz v. TuchmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gogebic Auto Co. v. Gogebic County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kelly v. SigismundSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API