Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Tuchman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill to enforce a partial assignment of a fund alleged to be in the hands of some of the defendants. Defendants Tuchman and Stellwagen entered into an agreement to exchange properties. Tuchman’s property consisted of eight stores with a garage in the rear, located at the comer of Shoemaker and St. Clair avenues in the city of Detroit. Stellwagen had a farm in Sumpter township in Wayne county. The exchange agreement is in the form of a written offer to Paterson brothers and an acceptance by Stellwagen. The material part of the offer is as follows:

“Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Exchange Bank v. McLoonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henry Ford Health System v. Everest National Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Gogebic Auto Co. v. Gogebic County Board of Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. First National Bank of Wayne v. Gross Real Estate Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gauthier v. PeiterMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. C-Spine Orthopedics Pllc v. Progressive Michigan Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API