Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Nuckolls

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 20, 1995No. 94-370PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

After hearing almost three weeks of testimony, the jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Ford Motor Company in this products liability case. The defendant’s verdict was rendered at the close of the first part of a bifurcated trial, but it ended the trial because there was no need for the jury to hear the second part of the case, which was Ford Motor Company’s cross-claim against other defendants for reimbursement under the Joint Tortfeasors Act. After the judgment was entered, the plaintiffs moved for a new trial. The trial judge granted a new trial on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Linda Anderson, Derriel Anderson v. James E. Malloy, Peter Zes, Edward J. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Nazarenko v. CTI Trucking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Diemer v. DischlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Jones v. Double "D" Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Steward v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. DaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API