Legal Opinion

Bragg v. Bragg

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1939No. Civ. 11021PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

In an action for divorce plaintiff had judgment from which the defendant has appealed citing, among other grounds, that the plaintiff was not a bona fide resident of the county in which the proceedings were held and that his testimony concerning acts of cruelty was not corroborated.

The parties were married in 1926. The plaintiff was then seventy-six years of age and defendant was fifty-five. The plaintiff was a widower and had four adult children. The defendant was a widow and had a married daughter. All •maintained their own homes-—the defendant’s daughter in San Mateo County near where the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryder v. RyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Warren v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bullard v. BullardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bragg v. BraggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Goodloe v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Gates v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  4. Aldabe v. AldabeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Nelson v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API