Legal Opinion

S. Ward Hamilton Co. v. Channell Chemical Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 17, 1926No. Gen. No. 30,709Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomson

The parties to this case entered into a contract on October 3, 1919, by which the plaintiff, S. Ward Hamilton Company, agreed to manufacture and sell to the defendant, Channell Chemical Company, 3,000,000 mop centers. There were three sizes specified in the contract, numbered 3, 4 and 10. The contract called for 750,000 of No. 3, 1,500,000 of No. 4, and 750,000 of No. 10. Under the terms of the contract, the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff $51.50 per thousand for the No. 3 centers; $46.50 for the No. 4, and $56.50 for the No. 10. The plaintiff undertook to deliver 10,000 centers per…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lauth v. Chicago Union Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lyons v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. DonworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. R. v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Kingman & Co. v. Hanna Wagon Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API