Legal Opinion

Walker-Schaut v. Lido Labs Holding Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 26, 2024No. 3:23-cv-05944Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 CHRISTY WALKER-SCHAUT, CASE NO. C23-5944 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 LIDO LABS HOLDING COMPANY, 11 Defendant. 12 13 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Christy Walker-Schaut’s motion to 14 dismiss Defendant Lido Labs Holding Company’s fraud counterclaim. Dkt. 33. Because 15 Lido fails to state a plausible fraud counterclaim, the motion is granted. 16 Walker-Schaut sued Lido, alleging that it violated both the Washington Consumer 17 Protection Act (CPA) and the federal Telephone Consumer Protection…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API