Legal Opinion

Kelley Kar Co. v. Finkler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1951No. 32281Published

1Opinion of the Court

99 N.E.2d 665 (1951)

155 Ohio St. 541

KELLEY KAR CO.

v.

FINKLER.

No. 32281.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

June 13, 1951.

Flynn, Py & Kruse and Raymond N. Watts, all of Sandusky, for appellee.

Terrell, Williams & Salim, Cleveland, for appellant.

MIDDLETON, Judge.

Can The Kelley Kar Company, relying solely upon the reservation of title contained in the conditional sale contract executed in California recover, in an Ohio court, possession of the automobile from Finkler who purchased it in good faith relying upon an Ohio certificate of title, regular on its face, and which named as the owner of the car the one…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Nichols v. Bogda Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API