Legal Opinion

Seversike v. Omaha Flour Mills Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1935No. 29576PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

In this case the appellant, Rudolph Seversike, brought suit against the appellee, Omaha Flour Mills Company, to recover benefits alleged to be due under the workmen’s compensation act for the loss of his left arm. The trial court found that the injury complained of did not arise out of and in the course of his employment by the appellee. From an order dismissing the action, appellant brings the case to this court on appeal.

In order for an injury to be compensable under the workmen’s compensation act, it must be caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of the workman’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pappas v. Yant Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hammond v. KeimNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Babcock v. School District No. 107Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Hall v. Austin Western Road Machinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luke v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API