Legal Opinion

Ex parte Callow

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 1, 1916No. 6526PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Habeas Corpus. In the matter of the application of Harold E. Callow, otherwise known as H. E. Callow, for writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from restraint in deportation proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner is a British subject, and the restraint complained of is by an inspector of immigration who, at the time the writ issued, held the petitioner under a warrant for deportation.

[1 ] The warrant of arrest was issued February 28th last and named two grounds as violative of the Act of February 20, 1907, and its amendment (Act March 26,1910, c. 128, 36 Stat. 263), to wit:

“That he (H. E. Callo-w) was a person likely to become a public charge at the time of his entry into the United States; and tjiat he entered without the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte GytlDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peter Ying and Wong Chai Liang v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  2. United States Ex Rel. Lisafeld v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1924
  3. United States ex rel. Dombrowski v. KarnuthDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
  4. RUISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
  5. Kokkosis v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API