Legal Opinion

Kokkosis v. Esperdy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 25, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved, pursuant to an order to show cause, for a stay of deportation. The defendant has cross-moved for summary judgment on the plaintiff’s original complaint.

This Court has jurisdiction of this action under 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009 (Administrative Procedure Act), 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (Declaratory Judgment) and 8 U.S.C.A. § 1329 (Immigration and Nationality Act).

There is no dispute as to any material issue of fact. Therefore, summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is proper, 28 U.S.C.

The plaintiff is a native and citizen of Greece who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte CallowDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1916
  2. Ex parte YabucaninDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lam Man Chi, Lum Hong and Young Sau Yu v. E. P. Bouchard, as District Director for the Immigration and Naturalization Service of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. Chee Hock Chan v. HurneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. United States ex rel. Yip Cheung Fong v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API