State v. Miller
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, C. J. —
Defendant and appellant, Arthur Miller, gambler by occupation, was convicted of grand larceny. In October, 1928, at Boulder, Colorado, he had married the prosecuting witness, Irene Miller. Due, possibly, to the peripatetic nature of the skipper’s business and a suspected weakness for the fair sex, of which more later, the matrimonial barque encountered squalls, culminating in a decree of divorce granted the wife, after default, by the district court of Bonneville county September 19, 1931. The complaint charged defendant with about everything from seven-up to manslaughter,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. ChanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. PanagoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- State v. FoellIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AyresIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. GishIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. MundellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. RuttenIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.