Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Farley

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for costs rendered in favor of the defendant in the seventh district, Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

The plaintiff brought this action for a commission, claimed by him to have been earned as a broker in procuring a purchaser for certain premises owned by the defendant.

The material facts in the case are undisputed. The plaintiff was authorized by the defendant to procure a purchaser for certain premises owned by the defendant, for which the defendant agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of 1 per cent, commission.

*169To enable the plaintiff to effect a sale the defendant stated to the plaintiff, that the lot to be sold was twenty-three feet wide by one hundred feet deep. He also gave to the plaintiff a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. C. H. Diamond & Co. v. HartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Little v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API