Legal Opinion

Amsbaugh v. Exchange Bank of Maquoketa, Iowa

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Morris District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts. At the April Term, 1884, the,plaintiff bank, on the two causes of action stated in its petition, recovered a judgment against defendant Amsbaugh for $1,361.86 and costs. New trial denied. The defendant brings the case to this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

This action was commenced in the district court of Morris county, by the Exchange bank of Ma-quoketa, Iowa, against W. H. Amsbaugh, of Dunlap, Kansas, to recover the amount of two certain judgments rendered against the defendant in the circuit court of Jackson county, Iowa. The defendant set up the defense that these judgments were rendered without any notice to him, without any appearance on his part, and, indeed, without any jurisdiction whatever as to him personally; and therefore he claims that said judgments are void. The case was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Earle v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Mastin v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Moore v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Litowich v. LitowichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Davis v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Merritt v. HeffernanSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Raher v. RaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Ford v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Dillon v. HellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API