Legal Opinion

In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 15, 2019No. 2:11-cv-01016Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 PROTOCOL LITIGATION Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This document relates to: Plaintiffs James Hanna and Melvin Bonnell. : SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON THE MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE JOSEPH ANTOGNINI, M.D. This § 1983 case is before the Court on Plaintiff Cleveland Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Exclude and/or Limit the Testimony of Defendants’ expert Joseph F. Antognini, M.D. (Antognini Motion, ECF No. 2318). After that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Best v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Fears v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API