Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Seay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1917No. 7383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrate'S, J.

This suit was brought by M. D. Seay and others, as plaintiffs, against James Floyd and others, as defendants, on two promissory notes executed by two of the defendants, Hollan Floyd and Yetta Floyd, and to foreclose a deed of trust given •by them and another defendant, J. W. Floyd, to secure the notes, upon three tracts of land, the first of which, and the only one involved in the controversy, is described as containing about 1,000 acres out of the Nunn and Stewart tract in the Isabella Townsend league in-Madison county, Tex.

Plaintiffs alleged that Hollan Floyd had, on the 16th day of June,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ButlerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Moss v. HelsleyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Haley v. GatewoodTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Crosson v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Parker v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sailer v. FurcheTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API