Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1968No. 41003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Klingbiel

Roy B. Farley filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. A hearing was had before an arbitrator, who found no causal connection and denied the claim. The Industrial Commission reversed and awarded compensation, but on review the circuit court of Winnebago County set aside the award. The claimant appeals directly to this court as authorized by Rule 302. (36 Ill.2d 103.) The principal question is whether a causal connection was proved between the alleged injury and a condition of ill-being some ten months later.

The claimant was employed by the Bethlehem…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rockford Clutch Division, Borg-Warner Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Oros v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Swift & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Jones v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Daugherty v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chadwick v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Chicago Transit Authority v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API