Legal Opinion

Universal Credit Co. v. Uggla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1936PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order reversed on the law, with costs, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: The moving affidavits contain no allegation to the effect that the plaintiff believes there is no defense to the action. While this may be thought to be a somewhat technical objection to the granting of the motion, such an allegation is a requisite prescribed by rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Its necessity is upheld in First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Holt & Thomas, Inc. (236 App. Div. 714). The remedy of summary judgment is a drastic one, and the requirements of the rule should be strictly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Holt & Thomas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Freund v. James McCullagh, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Lindner v. EichelNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Baronberg v. HumphreysCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937
  4. Farrell v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Fleischer v. N. T. A. Pictures, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API