Legal Opinion

Farrell v. Shelby Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid S. Motile, J.

This is an application for an order granting a summary judgment to the defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

On June 8, 1956, plaintiff suffered personal injuries near Ogdensburg, New York, while in an automobile owned by Thomas Holihan of Lakewood, Ohio. Holihan was insured with the defendant. Under the terms of its policy, it, among other things, agreed to pay any person injured while in the automobile of Holihan all expenses incurred for medical care and treatment up to $500. There is no question of Holihan being covered at the time and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Anderson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Pribyl v. Van Loan & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Universal Credit Co. v. UgglaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Bertolf Bros. v. LeuthardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lindner v. EichelNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API